MLB Players Association interim executive director Bruce Meyer said Monday he was caught off guard by the details of the salary cap proposal owners submitted last week, asserting the union's analysis shows players would earn less overall under the plan, with amateur signees facing the steepest losses.
"I thought they would try harder to make it look good, and they didn't even do that," Meyer said on a video conference call with reporters.
The union estimates players would have lost more than $500 million in 2026 had the league's proposed system been in place. MLB spokesperson Glen Caplin pushed back, saying major league players would actually receive more compensation in year one of the cap system than they earned in 2026.
A central point of dispute is how revenue and player share are calculated. Meyer argued the league's 50/50 split is misleading because the formula deducts billions in expenses before calculating each side's portion.
"It's not even a real 50 percent," Meyer said.
The union also contends the league's financial projections implicitly eliminate or drastically reduce the roughly $600 million clubs currently pay annually to domestic and international amateur prospects. Meyer said no formal proposal on amateur compensation has been submitted, but the numbers point in that direction.
"They projected MLB players' payroll in '27, '28, would be flat," Meyer said. "The only way to get to even those numbers would be to drastically reduce or eliminate amateur entry compensation, both domestic and international."
The two sides also clashed over how to measure payroll disparity. Commissioner Rob Manfred last week cited a $446 million gap between the Los Angeles Dodgers and the Miami Marlins. Meyer countered that figure incorrectly folds luxury tax penalties into payroll totals, inflating the gap.
No further bargaining sessions are scheduled. The current labor agreement expires December 1, and a lockout is widely anticipated if no deal is reached by then.
"Our union has never been broken and never will be," Meyer said. "You can take away a different lesson from our history, but that would be a big mistake."